Show simple item record

dc.contributor.editorSimpson, S.
dc.contributor.editorBatley, G.
dc.coverage.spatialAustralia watersen_US
dc.coverage.spatialNew Zealand watersen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-19T22:37:44Z
dc.date.available2019-06-19T22:37:44Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationSimpson, S. and Batley, G. (eds) (2016) Sediment quality assessment: a practical guide. Second edition. Clayton, Australia, CSIRO Publishing, 346pp. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25607/OBP-498en_US
dc.identifier.isbn9781486303861 (epub)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11329/964
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.25607/OBP-498
dc.description.abstractThe last decade has seen an exponential growth in our understanding of the forms, fate and effects of contaminants in sediments. In Australia, as in many parts of the world, sediment quality guidelines are now well established in regulatory frameworks. However, detailed guidance on how to interpret and apply the guidelines is generally limited. It is recognised that additional research is needed to resolve several uncertainties in the science underpinning sediment quality guidelines. In Australia and New Zealand, the approach has been to introduce a tiered assessment framework so that exceedance of the sediment quality guideline value leads to additional studies to confirm or deny the possibility of biological impacts. This approach is outlined in the Australian and New Zealand guidelines for fresh and marine water quality, published in 2000. In 2010, the sediment quality guidelines for Australia and New Zealand were revised (by the editors and an author of the present volume). The revision introduces the use of multiple lines of evidence in a weight-of-evidence approach to the assessment. This is consistent with similar developments internationally. The approach extends the current decision framework so that it provides a means, where necessary, of combining lines of evidence. For example, bioaccumulation and ecological assessments can now be combined with the traditional chemistry and laboratory toxicity lines of evidence, and there is now a mechanism for bringing in additional information on chemical exposure and bioavailability which can improve assessments of causality. Thus, now, investigations should ideally combine assessments of: ● sediment chemistry (such as exceedances of sediment quality guidelines), including contaminant bioavailability tests (for example, pore-water measurements, acid volatile sulfide tests, passive sampling methods and approaches that mimic biotic responses to hydrophobic organic contaminants); ● toxicity testing (for example, of multiple species, varying exposure pathways, and acute and chronic endpoints such as survival, growth, reproduction or avoidance, and biomarkers of effects); ● bioaccumulation or biomagnification; and ● benthic community structure and function. Toxicity identification evaluation (TIE) and other assessments of causality may also be of value. The combination and interaction between lines of evidence should be considered in applying these in a weight-of-evidence framework (for instance, particle size affects contaminant bioavailability, and bioavailability test results will affect the interpretation of toxicity and bioaccumulation data). Weight-of-evidence assessments often ultimately rely on best professional judgment, but the use of tabular decision matrices is the best approach for achieving transparency and comprehension by personnel outside the field of ecological risk assessment. viii Sediment Quality Assessment Environmental practitioners are seeking guidance on how to incorporate the latest science in their assessment of contaminated sediments, while relating their investigations to the recommended guideline frameworks, and proposed new or revised guideline values for sediment quality, at a time when the science is still being developed. This handbook therefore attempts to summarise the advances and provide information to guide future sediment quality assessment investigations. The book both reviews the existing literature and recommends best ways to apply these findings, while describing approaches for measuring the various lines of evidence. As new lines of evidence are continuing to be developed, future sediment quality assessments may also incorporate those. A general approach is proposed, recognising that assessments frequently need to be custom-designed and lines of evidence chosen to suit the site-specific circumstances (such as site dynamics, sediment stability, groundwater flows, and fluctuating overlying water conditions). The focus on sediment quality assessment, at least in Australia, has largely been in estuarine and coastal marine environments, but the principles are equally applicable to freshwater systems, and guidance is therefore also provided in this book for freshwater toxicity testing and ecological assessment procedures for freshwater environments.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCSIRO Publishingen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.subject.otherSediment samplingen_US
dc.titleSediment quality assessment: a practical guide. Second edition.en_US
dc.typeBook/Monographen_US
dc.description.statusPublisheden_US
dc.format.pages346pp.en_US
dc.description.refereedRefereeden_US
dc.publisher.placeClayton, Australiaen_US
dc.subject.parameterDisciplineParameter Discipline::Marine geology::Rock and sediment physical propertiesen_US
dc.description.currentstatusCurrenten_US
dc.description.maturitylevelTRL 9 Actual system "mission proven" through successful mission operations (ground or space)en_US
dc.description.bptypeGuideen_US
obps.contact.contactemailcsiroenquiries@csiro.au
obps.resourceurl.publisherhttps://publications.csiro.au/rpr/download?pid=csiro:EP165955&dsid=DS1en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0