Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCamenzuli, Danielle
dc.contributor.authorFreidman, Benjamin L.
dc.contributor.authorStatham, Tom M.
dc.contributor.authorMumford, Kathryn A.
dc.contributor.authorGore, Damian B.
dc.coverage.spatialArctic Regionen_US
dc.coverage.spatialAntarctic Regionen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-05T18:39:12Z
dc.date.available2023-05-05T18:39:12Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationCamenzuli, D., Freidman, B. L., Statham, T. M., Mumford, K. A.and Gore, D. B. (2013) On-site and in situ remediation technologies applicable to metal-contaminated sites in Antarctica and the Arctic: A review. Polar Research, 32:21522, 15pp. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3402/polar.v32.21522en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.oceanbestpractices.org/handle/11329/2196
dc.description.abstractEffective management of contaminated land requires a sound understanding of site geology, chemistry and biology. This is particularly the case for Antarctica and the Arctic, which function using different legislative frameworks to those of industrialized, temperate environments and are logistically challenging environments to operate in. This paper reviews seven remediation technologies currently used, or demonstrating potential for on-site or in situ use at metal-contaminated sites in polar environments, namely permeable reactive barriers (PRB), chemical fixation, bioremediation, phytoremediation, electrokinetic separation, land capping, and pump and treat systems. The technologies reviewed are discussed in terms of their advantages, limitations and overall potential for the management of metal-contaminated sites in Antarctica and the Arctic. This review demonstrates that several of the reviewed technologies show potential for on-site or in situ usage in Antarctica and the Arctic. Of the reviewed technologies, chemical fixation and PRB are particularly promising technologies for metal-contaminated sites in polar environments. However, further research and relevant field trials are required before these technologies can be considered proven techniques.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.otherBioremediationen_US
dc.subject.otherPermeable reactive barriersen_US
dc.titleOn-site and in situ remediation technologies applicable to metal-contaminated sites in Antarctica and the Arctic: a review.en_US
dc.typeJournal Contributionen_US
dc.description.refereedRefereeden_US
dc.format.pagerange15pp.en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3402/polar.v32.21522
dc.subject.parameterDisciplineHuman activityen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.titlePolar Researchen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume33en_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue21522en_US
dc.description.sdg14.1en_US
obps.contact.contactnameDanielle Camenzuli
obps.contact.contactemaildanielle.camenzuli@mq.edu.au
obps.resourceurl.publisherhttps://polarresearch.net/index.php/polar/article/view/3079


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International