Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRodríguez-Ramos, Tamara
dc.contributor.authorDornelas, María
dc.contributor.authorMarañón, Emilio
dc.contributor.authorCermeño, Pedro
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-24T19:28:29Z
dc.date.available2023-01-24T19:28:29Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationRodríguez-Ramos, T., Dornelas, M., Marañón, E. and Cermeño, P. (2014) Conventional sampling methods severely underestimate phytoplankton species richness. Journal of Plankton Research, 36, pp.334-343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbt115en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.oceanbestpractices.org/handle/11329/2127
dc.description.abstractConventional methods for the estimation of marine phytoplankton diversity include the collection of a small volume of seawater which is analysed under the microscope. We sampled natural communities and also synthetic communities generated under a neutral community model configuration and demonstrate that traditional sampling methods underestimate the species richness of marine phytoplankton communities. In our model, a synthetic community represents an ensemble of individuals enclosed in a parcel of seawater wherein the dynamics of each population is controlled by demographic stochasticity and dispersal. By sampling these synthetic communities, we found that roughly 20 –45% of the species is missed by conventional, small volume samples. Consistent with the simulations, field data showed that the number of species increases with sampling effort by up to ~1.5-fold, revealing that these microbial communities might be more diverse than previously estimated. We suggest that conventional sampling methods have limited our ability to delineate the patterns of marine phytoplankton diversity and identify the underlying mechanisms. Improved sampling methods are proposed to obtain more accurate estimates of marine phytoplankton diversity.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subject.otherGrupo de Oceanografía Biológica, University of Vigoen_US
dc.subject.otherSample sizeen_US
dc.subject.otherRare speciesen_US
dc.subject.otherNeutral modelsen_US
dc.subject.otherPhytplankton diversityen_US
dc.titleConventional sampling methods severely underestimate phytoplankton species richness.en_US
dc.typeJournal Contributionen_US
dc.description.refereedRefereeden_US
dc.format.pagerangepp.334-343en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbt115
dc.subject.parameterDisciplinePhytoplanktonen_US
dc.subject.dmProcessesData acquisitionen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.titleJournal of Plankton Researchen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume36en_US
dc.description.eovPhytoplankton biomass and diversityen_US
dc.description.maturitylevelMatureen_US
dc.description.adoptionInternationalen_US
dc.description.methodologyTypeMethodological commentary/perspecten_US
dc.description.methodologyTypeReports with methodological relevanceen_US
obps.endorsementAuthorDeclared.recommendedPracticeOSPAR
obps.contact.contactemail:tamara@uvigo.es
obps.contact.contactorcid0000-0002-8766-9991
obps.resourceurl.publisherhttps://academic.oup.com/plankt/article/36/2/334/1501488


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record