Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorClare, Michael A.
dc.contributor.authorVardy, Mark E.
dc.contributor.authorCartigny, Matthieu J.B.
dc.contributor.authorTalling, Peter J.
dc.contributor.authorHimsworth, Matthew D.
dc.contributor.authorDix, Justin K.
dc.contributor.authorHarris, John M.
dc.contributor.authorWhitehouse, Richard J.S.
dc.contributor.authorBelal, Mohammad
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-11T20:26:33Z
dc.date.available2020-04-11T20:26:33Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationClare, M.A. ; Vardy, M.E.; Cartigny, M.J.B.; Talling, P.J.; Himsworth, M.D.; Dix, J.K.; Harris, J.M.; Whitehouse, R.J.S. and Belal, M. (2017) Direct monitoring of active geohazards: emerging geophysical tools for deep-water assessments. Near Surface Geophysics, 15, pp.427-444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3997/1873-0604.2017033en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11329/1270
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.25607/OBP-785
dc.description.abstractSeafloor networks of cables, pipelines, and other infrastructure underpin our daily lives, providing communication links, information, and energy supplies. Despite their global importance, these networks are vulnerable to damage by a number of natural seafloor hazards, including landslides, turbidity currents, fluid flow, and scour. Conventional geophysical techniques, such as high-resolution reflection seismic and side-scan sonar, are commonly employed in geohazard assessments. These conventional tools provide essential information for route planning and design; however, such surveys provide only indirect evidence of past processes and do not observe or measure the geohazard itself. As such, many numerical-based impact models lack field-scale calibration, and much uncertainty exists about the triggers, nature, and frequency of deep-water geohazards. Recent advances in technology now enable a step change in their understanding through direct monitoring. We outline some emerging monitoring tools and how they can quantify key parameters for deepwater geohazard assessment. Repeat seafloor surveys in dynamic areas show that solely relying on evidence from past deposits can lead to an under-representation of the geohazard events. Acoustic Doppler current profiling provides new insights into the structure of turbidity currents, whereas instrumented mobile sensors record the nature of movement at the base of those flows for the first time. Existing and bespoke cabled networks enable high bandwidth, low power, and distributed measurements of parameters such as strain across large areas of seafloor. These techniques provide valuable new measurements that will improve geohazard assessments and should be deployed in a complementary manner alongside conventional geophysical tools.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleDirect monitoring of active geohazards: emerging geophysical tools for deep-water assessments.en_US
dc.typeJournal Contributionen_US
dc.description.refereedRefereeden_US
dc.format.pagerangepp.427-444en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3997/1873-0604.2017033
dc.subject.parameterDisciplineParameter Discipline::Marine geology::Field geophysicsen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.titleNear Surface Geophysicsen_US
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume15en_US
dc.description.sdg14.Aen_US
dc.description.bptypeManual (incl. handbook, guide, cookbook etc)en_US
obps.contact.contactemailmichael.clare@noc.ac.uk
obps.resourceurl.publisherhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.3997/1873-0604.2017033en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International