dc.contributor.author | Chu, Brian | |
dc.contributor.author | Madhavan, Vashisht | |
dc.contributor.author | Beijbom, Oscar | |
dc.contributor.author | Hoffman, Judy | |
dc.contributor.author | Darrell, Trevor | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-03-31T14:11:32Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-03-31T14:11:32Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Chu, B. et al (2016) Best Practices for Fine-tuning Visual Classifiers to New Domains. In: Comouter Visions, ECCV 2016 Workshop. (eds. G. Hua and H. Jégou). Switzerlnd, Springer International Publishings, 8pp. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25607/OBP-765 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11329/1250 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.25607/OBP-765 | |
dc.description.abstract | Recent studies have shown that features from deep convolutional neural networks learned using large labeled datasets, like ImageNet, provide effective representations for a variety of visual recognition
tasks. They achieve strong performance as generic features and are even
more effective when fine-tuned to target datasets. However, details of
the fine-tuning procedure across datasets and with different amount of labeled data are not well-studied and choosing the best fine-tuning method
is often left to trial and error. In this work we systematically explore the
design-space for fine-tuning and give recommendations based on two key
characteristics of the target dataset: visual distance from source dataset
and the amount of available training data. Through a comprehensive experimental analysis, we conclude, with a few exceptions, that it is best
to copy as many layers of a pre-trained network as possible, and then
adjust the level of fine-tuning based on the visual distance from source. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Springer | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Moorea Labeled Corals | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Imaging Flow Cytobot Data Plankton | en_US |
dc.title | Best Practices for Fine-tuning Visual Classifiers to New Domains. | en_US |
dc.type | Book Section | en_US |
dc.description.status | Published | en_US |
dc.description.refereed | Refereed | en_US |
dc.publisher.place | Switzerland | en_US |
dc.format.pagerange | pp.435-442 | en_US |
dc.subject.dmProcesses | Data Management Practices::Data format development | en_US |
dc.description.currentstatus | Current | en_US |
dc.contributor.editorparent | Hua, Gang | |
dc.contributor.editorparent | Jégou, Hervé | |
dc.title.parent | Computer Vision – ECCV 2016 Workshops: Amsterdam, The Netherlands ..., Part 3. | en_US |
dc.description.sdg | 14.A | en_US |
dc.description.eov | Zooplankton biomass and diversity | en_US |
dc.description.maturitylevel | TRL 4 Component/subsystem validation in laboratory environment | en_US |
dc.description.bptype | Best Practice | en_US |
obps.contact.contactemail | brian.c@berkeley.edu | |
obps.resourceurl.publisher | http://adas.cvc.uab.es/task-cv2016/papers/0002.pdf | en_US |